I compare it to Andrew Sullivan's blog who posts a lot of shit and extensive commentary on some of it. Of course, Sullivan probably has a shitload of people mining information for him, and I wouldn't be surprised if he had people writing things for him to tweak and post as well. There is a lot of content on his page, too much to keep up with sometimes. It is varied too, so I'm sure much of it is skipped over by most readers.
Yours is one of the blogs I read every day, seems a good balance of content and commentary, and no extreme BS.
Not sure. Thought about reposting, then I would know for sure. Or maybe another comment like, "Was it something I said?" Only with Firefox history was I able to retrieve my comment.
No comments:
Post a Comment