Sunday, April 20, 2025

Recently I listened to 


From Amazon: 

The National Security Agency is the world's most powerful, most far-reaching espionage organization. Now with a new afterword describing the security lapses that preceded the attacks of September 11, 2001, Body of Secrets takes us to the inner sanctum of America's spy world. In the follow-up to his best-selling Puzzle Palace, James Bamford reveals the NSA's hidden role in the most volatile world events of the past, and its desperate scramble to meet the frightening challenges of today and tomorrow.


Here is a scrupulously documented account - much of which is based on unprecedented access to previously undisclosed documents - of the agency's tireless hunt for intelligence on enemies and allies alike. Body of Secrets is a riveting analysis of this most clandestine of agencies, a major work of history and investigative journalism.


Very interesting read. I got me thinking, so I asked ChatGPT to compare it to LLM infrastructure.

🛰️ National Security Agency vs. Large Language Models: Same Infrastructure, Different Masks?

By Steve — April 2025

We rarely see it spelled out, but it's staring us in the face: the infrastructure behind mass surveillance and large-scale AI is disturbingly similar. The NSA and today’s LLM powerhouses (OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, Meta) might claim wildly different missions — one defends national security, the other predicts your next sentence — but peel back the surface and you’ll find shared DNA.

This post breaks it down: function by function, intention by intention.


🧠 Core Comparison: NSA vs. LLM Infrastructure

Category NSA (Surveillance Infrastructure) LLMs (Language Model Infrastructure)
Mission Surveillance, signals intelligence, cyber operations Language generation, interaction, prediction
Data Ingest Global telecom, fiber taps, satellites, intercepts Web scraping: Common Crawl, books, Wikipedia, forums
Data Type Voice, text, metadata, imagery Text (increasingly image/audio/video too)
Processing Real-time stream decoding, bulk signal analysis Batch GPU/TPU pipelines, transformer inference
Compute NSA supercomputers, custom ASICs, classified clusters NVIDIA A100/H100, TPUs, hyperscale data centers
Storage Petabyte/exabyte storage (e.g., Utah Data Center) Massive datasets + model weights (100s of GBs to TBs)
Energy Use Estimated 60–70 MW per site (unconfirmed) Public training runs use 1,000+ MWh
Footprint Global — embassies, cable taps, satellite stations Global — commercial data centers in U.S., EU, Asia
Secrecy Total — classified, legally shielded Mixed — some open-source, most proprietary
Legal Framework FISA, EO12333, Patriot Act GDPR, CCPA, copyright litigation

🎯 Convergence in Function

Strip away the mission statements. What’s left?

  • Both systems want raw data from the world.
  • Both use colossal compute to interpret that data.
  • Both output probabilistic models of behavior.

One spies on speech to identify threats. The other learns from speech to simulate intelligence.
They’re not twins. But they’re definitely related.


🧨 Divergence in Intent

NSA LLMs
Built to control, target, and neutralize Built to simulate, predict, and respond
Operates under state secrecy Operates under corporate secrecy
Prioritizes signals (who, when, where) Prioritizes semantics (what, why, how)

For now, the divergence is clear. But the line is thinning — especially as defense contracts start injecting AI into surveillance and border enforcement.


🕳️ So What?

If the infrastructure is nearly identical — mass ingestion, hypercompute, centralized storage, opaque governance — then the difference is ideological, not technical.

And ideology is always subject to change.

LLMs don’t have to be built for surveillance.
But they can be.
And increasingly, they will be.


🚨 Final Thought

We're not looking at two separate towers.
We’re looking at the same structure — one cloaked in patriotism, the other in productivity.

Watch carefully when — not if — they merge.


Want a visual breakdown or downloadable version of this post? Contact me.

No comments: