This is interesting. Going through some of the blogs I read, I came across someone saying there is an error in the way NASA comes up with temperatures people use for global climate models and graphs. This was a good opportunity to find out if this guy that keeps the Impact site updated as religiously as he told me he did. On his site there is a link to another list of links titled Other Side of the Global Warming Debate. Sure enough, he has the information about the error. Following links will lead here, which is interesting reading.

My point is, and has always been, that there isn't a 'consensus' as some suggest. It doesn't take much work to find honest to goodness scientists that question the warming theory alone, let alone the anthropological basis for any warming. Nobody is suggesting that there will not be global warming, they just question some of the 'evidence' for it. Questions are good when you are looking for scientific confirmation of any theory, that is what science is all about. Red flags go up when I hear someone has said that the debate is over.

Another interesting post from the Coyote website, about hurricanes. I particularly like the discussion about tornadoes.